Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 5 April 2000

P Q Data Trading (Pty) and Alexander For

CT LM062Mar00 · case LM062Mar00

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 5 April 2000
CitationCT LM062Mar00
Case numberLM062Mar00

The judgment

The court's own file

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 37/LM/Mar00 In the large merger between: Alexander Forbes Group (Pty) Ltd and Persetel Q Data Trading (Pty) Ltd Reasons for the Competition Tribunal’s Decision Approval 1. The Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate on 05 April 2000 approving the merger between Alexander Forbes Group (Pty) Ltd and Persetel Q Data Trading (Pty) Ltd without conditions. The reasons for our decision to approve the merger without conditions are set out below. The merger transaction 2. Alexander Forbes Group (Pty) Ltd (‘Alexander Forbes’) acquired a division of the business of Persetel Q Data (Pty) Ltd (‘PQ Data’), the Remuneration Consulting Surveys division, for R1 000 0000 on 1 July 1999. The effective date of the transaction is 01 June 1999 and the merger was accordingly notified in terms of Schedule 3 of the Act. Remuneration Consulting Surveys was subsequently on-sold to PSG Matrix (Pty) Ltd on 12 January 2000 for R500 000 because the demand for its services did not meet the expectations of Alexander Forbes. Evaluating the merger 3. According to the Commission’s report there is no overlap between the businesses of the merging firms. The division of PQ Data purchased by Alexander Forbes provides a remuneration consulting service. It conducts market remuneration surveys and provides information on Human Resource administration and management, and remuneration management and packaging. Alexander Forbes is involved in retirement fund administration, insurance, re-insurance and risk finance consulting. The relevant product/services market 4. As appears in paragraph 3 above there is no service or product overlap between Alexander Forbes and Remuneration Consulting Surveys, being the division of PQ Data acquired by Alexander Forbes. They provide completely different services and therefore compete in different product or service markets. Impact on competition 5. There is no overlap between the businesses of the merging parties and the merger will not affect competition in the markets where the parties compete. In any event Alexander Forbes has sold the division of business bought from PQ Data and this rules out any possibility of the merger having an adverse impact on competition. 6. The Tribunal therefore agrees with the Commission that this merger raises no competition concerns. Public Interest Considerations 7. The merger does not raise any public interest concerns. In terms of the merger agreement Alexander Forbes took over the whole division of Remuneration Consulting Surveys without change in personnel. Furthermore, as appears above in paragraphs 2 and 7, the division of PQ Data acquired by Alexander Forbes has already been sold. 05 April 2000 N.M. Manoim Date Concurring: D.H. Lewis, S. Zilwa

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.