Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 8 September 2005

The Spar Group Limited and Sparit Family

CT LM051Aug05 · case LM051Aug05

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downThursday 8 September 2005
CitationCT LM051Aug05
Case numberLM051Aug05

The judgment

The court's own file

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no.: 76/LM/Aug05 In the large merger between: Spar Group Ltd and Sparit Family Supermarkets (Pty) Ltd Reasons _______________________________________________________________ Introduction 1. On 8 September 2005 the Tribunal approved the merger between Spar Group Ltd and Sparit Family Supermarkets (Pty) Ltd. The reasons are set out below. The transaction 2. The Spar Group will acquire three retail supermarket businesses and two retail liquor outlets businesses, all owned by Sparit Supermarkets. 3. The Spar Group Ltd (“Spar Group”), which also controls Nelspruit Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd in South Africa, is a public company listed in the JSE. 4. Sparit Family Supermarkets (PtY) Ltd (“Sparit Supermarkets”) consists of the following retail businesses: ??Komati Spar, a retail store in Komatipoort, ??Hoedspruit Spar, a retail store in Hoedspruit, ??Greenview Spar, a retail store in Sabie, ??Mr Cellars Komati, a retail liquor store in Komatipoort, and ??Mr Cellars Sabie, a retail liquor store in Sabie 2 Rationale of the transaction 5. Spar submits that the transaction is a purely defensive strategy in order to keep the stores as Spar retail outlets. Spar Group intends to sell the stores as soon as possible to owners who will continue to operate them independently as Spar stores. It would appear that the owners are free to sell their businesses to other retailers and Spar is anxious to prevent these stores falling into the hands of a rival chain who would re-brand them. Background 6. The Spar Group Ltd (“Spar”) is a buying organization, which purchases, warehouses and distributes merchandise to and on behalf of its Spar Guild members. It owns six distribution centers, in Johannesburg, Olifantsfontein near Pretoria, Durban, Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Nelspruit, which service the 773 Spar stores throughout South Africa and neighbouring countries. The members are expected, but not obliged, to purchase most of their requirements from the Spar distribution centers or through nominated drop shipment suppliers. Effect on competition 7. Spar and its Guild members do not compete with each other but are in a vertical relationship. Spar trades in the wholesale m arket for household grocery products and its Guild members in the retail sector. 8. Whilst the rationale for the merger may be a pre-emptive strike to prevent a rival retailer getting hold of prime retail locations in the various local markets the merger does no more than preserve the status quo – a Spar retailer was in these sites pre-merger and will be so post merger. The merger would therefore not lead to a substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Public interest issues 9. No significant public interest issues arise from this transaction. ____________ 16 September 2005 N. Manoim Date Concurring: L. Reyburn and Y. Carrim

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.