Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 18 July 2007

Public Investment Corporation Limited An

CT LM013May07 · case LM013May07

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 18 July 2007
CitationCT LM013May07
Case numberLM013May07

The judgment

The court's own file

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 46/LM/May07 In the matter between: Public Investment Corporation Limited Acquiring Firm And CBS Property Portfolio Limited Target Firm Panel : D Lewis (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member), Heard on : 18 July 2007 Order Issued: 18 July 2007 Reasons Issued: 13 September 2007 Reasons for Decision Approval 1]On 18 July 2007, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between the Public Investment Corporation Limited and CBS Property Portfolio Limited. The reasons for approving the transaction follow. The parties 2]The primary acquiring firm is the Public Investment Corporation Limited (“PIC”), acting in its capacity as agent to the Government Employees Pension Fund. PIC is not controlled by any firm, and is an investment management company wholly owned by the South African Government. 3]PIC controls various firms. For the purposes of this transaction the following firms controlled by PIC are relevant: [3.1] ADRIASA (Pty) Ltd; [3.2] Black Ginger 33 (Pty) Ltd; [3.3] Van Noppen Properties (Pty) Ltd; [3.4] 1/1350 Zwartkop Centurion (Pty) Ltd; [3.5] Erf 3342 Phalaborwa (Pty) Ltd; and [3.6]Pareto Limited (40%), which is jointly controlled with ESKOM Pension and Provident Fund. 4]The primary target firm is CBS Property Portfolio Limited (“CBS”), a company incorporated under the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. CBS is a public company listed on the JSE Securities Exchange and is not controlled by any single firm. CBS controls various firms.1 Description of the transaction 5]PIC is acquiring all of the units linked in issue in CBS, other than those it already holds.2 The proposed transaction will result in PIC acquiring control of all the properties in the CBS property portfolio. Rationale for the transaction 6]The PIC intends to increase the property portfolio under its management to account for 5­8% of the total assets under PIC’s management. The parties’ activities 7]PIC is an investment management company that invests in various asset classes, including properties. PIC’s property portfolio consists of office 1 The firms controlled by CBS include Yieldgro Properties Limited, Riverband Trade and Investment 4 (Pty) Ltd, CBS Property Management (Pty) Ltd, Nelesco 531 (Pty) Ltd, Clifton Dunes Investment 399 (Pty) Ltd, Chestnut Hill Investments 266 (Pty) Ltd, Robstocks Parking Garage Shareblock (Pty) Ltd, and 35 Wales Street Parking Garage Shareblock (Pty) Ltd. 2 PIC currently holds approximately 13.1% of the CBS linked units in issue. 2 properties, retail properties, industrial properties, residential properties, specialised use properties and vacant land.3 8]CBS is a variable rate property loan stock company. It is listed on the Financial Services: Real Estate Holding and Development sector of the JSE Securities Exchange. CBS derives its income from rentals paid by tenants occupying its properties. CBS’s property portfolio consists of office properties, rental properties, industrial properties, residential properties, hotel properties and property used for educational purposes.4 Competition analysis 9]The Commission submitted that there is no overlap in the activities of the parties with regards to light industrial property, and retail property markets. There is a slight overlap in the activities of the parties in the office property market. In that regard, the Commission submitted that merging firms have a combined post merger market share for grade P office space in Sandton node of 2.6%, for grade A office properties in the Sandton node, 11% for grade B office property in the Midrand node and 3.6% for light industrial property in the Midrand node. These market shares are small and do not raise competition concerns. As a result, the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition. Public Interest 10]There are no public interest issues. Conclusion 11]The merger is approved unconditionally. ________________ 13 September 2007 D Lewis DATE Tribunal Member 3 See p310­318 of the record for a complete list of the properties implicated by this transaction. 4 See p310­318 of the record for a complete list of the properties implicated by this transaction 3 Y Carrim and M Mokuena concur in the judgment of D Lewis Tribunal Researcher: R Kariga For the merging parties:M Van Hoven, Jowell Glyn and Marais Attorneys For the Commission: M Dasrath and M Mohlala (Mergers and Acquisitions) 4

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.