CT LM051Jul08 · case LM051Jul08
1 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 79/LM/Jul08 In the matter between: Acucap Properties Ltd Acquiring Firm And Parkdev (Pty) Ltd Target Firm Panel : D Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal Member) and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) Heard on : 10 September 2008 Order issued on : 17 September 2008 Reasons issued on : 6 October 2008 Reasons for Decision Approval
[1]On 17 September 2008, the Tribunal approved the acquisition by Acucap Properties Ltd (“Acucap”) of certain assets and shares in Sycom Fund from Parkdev Pty Ltd (“Parkdev”). The reasons follow below. The Transaction
[2]The proposed transaction comprises a series of inter-related steps whereby Acucap will acquire certain interests and assets in Sycom Fund from Parkdev. 1 The various steps are: 1 Acucap also has an 18% stake in the Sycom Fund which was acquired during the first quarter of 2008. This was not disclosed to the Commission during its investigation into the transaction. Note that in paragraphs 3 and 4 below we discuss the fact that due to the legislation governing property trusts the party that controls the managing company also controls the underlying fund. 2 1. An asset management transaction whereby Acucap is acquiring 50% of the rights and obligations in Sycom Property Fund Managers (“SPFM”), 2. A property management transaction whereby Acucap is acquiring all the properties owned or co-owned by the Sycom Property Fund, 3. The sale of shares transaction whereby Acucap is acquiring 50% of the issued share capital in SPFM.
[3]Following the implementation of the proposed transaction Acucap will acquire sole control of the property management business of the Sycom Fund. Acucap and Parkdev will also share joint control of the asset management business as well as of SPFM. Going forward SPFM will contract certain of the asset management functions to Parkdev and the property management to Acucap. (See annexure A for a diagram of the structure post the transaction.)
[4]During the hearing the merging parties acknowledged that whoever controls SPFM also controls the Sycom Fund because there is a separation between ownership and control due to the regulatory environment within which they function. 2 Thus, as a result of the purchase of the shares in SPFM Acucap will acquire the ability to exercise joint control over the Sycom Property Fund. 3
[5]Acucap is a property loan stock company listed on the JSE Securities Exchange. Acucap is not controlled by any single firm. Its largest shareholder is the Public Investment Corporation.
[6]The primary target firms are all controlled by Parkdev. Parkdev in turn is controlled by Village Trust. 2 See transcript page 8. 3 This change in control over Sycom Fund from single to joint control triggers the notification of the large merger. 3 Rationale for the transaction
[7]The Boards of Acucap and Sycom have identified certain synergies between the two funds that would, by merging the two funds, realize substantial benefits to unitholders. The relevant market and the impact on competition
[8]Acucap owns retail properties, office buildings and industrial properties in Gauteng, Western Cape, Eastern Cape and Kwazulu Natal provinces. Sycom owns retail and office properties in Gauteng and the Western Cape province. The Commission found that the parties’ activities overlapped with regard to grade A office properties in the Sandton and Environs node, the Bryanston node and the Greater Woodmead node.
[9]Both parties also offer property and asset management services 4 , however, Acucap only offers its property and asset management services in-house while Sycom, in addition to its own properties, also provide these services to third parties. In light of the fact that Acucap does not offer these services to third parties, the Commission did not regarded them as competitors in this market. 5 We agree.
[10]The merged entity’s market share in the Grade A office property market will be: • Sandton and Environs node 4.78% • Bryanston node 7.4% • Greater Woodmead node 14.66%
[11]In light of the fact that the merged entity’s market shares remain low in the overlapping Grade A property markets we find that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the relevant markets. 4 Property management services concerns services such as collecting the rent, paying all bills and day to day maintenance of the property. Asset management services concerns financial functions on a fund level. 5 The merged entity’s market share in the asset management market will be 10.8% and the property management services market 7.1%. 4 CONCLUSION
[12]There are no significant public interest issues and we accordingly approve the transaction. __________________ 6 October 2008 N Manoim Date D Lewis and Y Carrim concurring Tribunal Researcher: R Badenhorst For the merging parties: Vani Chetty For the Commission: Xolela Nokela 5 Annexure A POST THE TRANSACTION 50% 50% 18.3% ACUCAP PROPERTIES LIMITED Subsidiaries Acucap Investments (Pty) Ltd Acucap Investments 2 (Pty) Ltd Acucap Investments 3 (Pty) Ltd Acucap Investments 4 (Pty) Ltd Intabrink Investments (Pty) Ltd Illovo Boulevard Piazzas (Pty) Ltd Atlas Properties Limited Advent Properties (Pty) Ltd Atlas Property Developments (Pty) Ltd Atlas Management Services (Pty) Ltd PROPERTY PORTFOLIO - Retail Assets R3.5b - Offices R1.5b SYCOM PROPERTY FUND PROPERTY PORTFOLIO - Retail Assets R2.6b - O ffi ces R1 .8b SYCOM PROPERTY FUND MANAGERS LIMITED 100% Fund Manager in terms of Trust Deed PARKDEV (PTY) LIMITED 50% Undivided Share in Asset Management Agreement 50% Undivided Share in Asset Management Agreement 100% 100% 100% Property Management Agreement 6
Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.