Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 23 September 2008

Absa Bank Limited and Ballito Junction D

CT LM056Aug08 · case LM056Aug08

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downTuesday 23 September 2008
CitationCT LM056Aug08
Case numberLM056Aug08

What it touches

The judgment

The court's own file

1 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO: 84/LM/AUG08 In the matter between: ABSA BANK LIMITED Acquiring Firm and BALLITO JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD Target firms ______________________________________________________________________ Panel : N Manoim (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member), and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member) Heard on : 23 September 2008 Order issued on : 23 September 2008 Reasons issued on : 22 October 2008 REASONS FOR DECISION APPROVAL 1. On 23 September 2008 the Tribunal approved the property merger between Absa and Ballito Junction. The reasons for the decision follow: THE PARTIES 2. The primary acquiring firm is ABSA Bank which owns the following retail shopping centres; Maxcity shopping centre, a community shopping centre situated in Mamelodi in Pretoria; Valley shopping centre, a neighbourhood 2 shopping centre situated in Dainfern in Johannesburg; and Krugersdorp shopping centre, a super-regional shopping centre in Krugersdorp, currently under construction. 1 The primary target firm is Ballito Junction Development (Pty) Ltd which is jointly controlled by ABSA Bank (50%) and Robfair Investments No. 139 CC (50%). Ballito Junction is a property holding company which owns only Ballito Shopping Centre, a neighborhood retail shopping centre, in Ballito, KwaZulu-Natal. THE TRANSACTION AND RATIONALE 3. The proposed transaction is a move from joint to sole control in that ABSA Bank intends to increase its shareholding in Ballito Junction from 50% to 100%. 4. Absa considers the proposed transaction as part of its wider strategy to secure returns from investments in the property sector. For Ballito Junction this is also part of its business development strategy. RELEVANT PRODUCT MARKET 5. There is only a horizontal overlap in the activities of the merging parties in respect to neighbourhood retail shopping centre. However, there is no geographic overlap since Absa does not have any neighbourhood retail shopping centre in Ballito, KwaZulu-Natal, where Ballito Junction’s only property is situated. CONCLUSION 6. In light of the above, we find that this merger will not result in any substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any of the relevant markets in the property sector. Accordingly, we approve the merger without conditions. 1 The terms community and neighbourhood refer to the size not the location of the shopping centres. 3 7. There are no public interest issues. _______________ 22 October 2008 N Manoim Date Tribunal Member Y Carrim and M Mokoena concur in the judgment of N Manoim For the merging parties : M Griffiths and E Posthumus of Absa For the Commission : T. Ravhugoni (Mergers and Acquisitions) Tribunal Researcher: L Xaba

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.