Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 8 October 2008

Pareto Limited and BandB Eindomme (Pty)

CT LM066Aug08 · case LM066Aug08

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 8 October 2008
CitationCT LM066Aug08
Case numberLM066Aug08

The judgment

The court's own file

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 93/LM/Aug08 In the matter between: Pareto Limited Acquiring Firm And B&B Eindomme (Pty) Ltd Target Firm Panel : D Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal Member), and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) Heard on : 8 October 2008 Order Issued : 8 October 2008 Reasons Issued: 3 December 2008 Reasons for Decision Approval

[1]On 8 October 2008, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between Pareto Limited and CIE B&B Eindomme (Pty) Ltd. The reasons for approving the transaction follow. The parties

[2]The primary acquiring firm is Pareto Limited (“Pareto”), a company incorporated under the company laws of South Africa. Pareto is controlled by the Eskom Pension & Provident Fund (“EPPF”). EPPF is controlled 60% by the Board of Trustees 1 and 40% by the Public Investment Corporation (“PIC”). The parties submitted that PIC does not control Pareto. 2 Pareto does not control any firm. 1 The Board of Trustees consist of Mr XK Memani, Mr MN Bailey, Mr B Blignaut, Mr WE Green, Mr A Jeawon, Mr GJ Kruger, Mr D Macatha, Ms JM Maisela, Mr TJ Matsau, Ms EM Pule, Mr WJ Swart, Mr MAP Tseki, Adv. NK Tsholanku and Dr EZ Xaba. 2 See record page 70. 2

[3]The primary target firm is B&B Eindomme (“Pty) Ltd (“B&B”). B&B is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mimosa Rolprentproduksie (Pty) Ltd (“Mimosa Rolprentproduksie”), which is controlled by Boet Troksie Kinders Trust (“BTKT”). B&B does not control any firm. Description of the transaction

[4]In terms of this transaction, Pareto intends to acquire from B&B a retail property known as “Mimosa Mall”, which is a shopping mall with grade P office space situated in Bloemfontein. At the conclusion of this transaction, Pareto will have sole control over Mimosa Mall. Rationale for the transaction

[5]The acquiring firm views this transaction as an opportunity to acquire a regional shopping centre in Bloemfontein.

[6]The target firm has submitted that it has decided to dispose of the Mall as it is unable to obtain municipal approval to extend the Mall. The parties’ activities Primary acquiring firm Pareto

[7]Pareto owns retail shopping centres with offices in Roodepoort, Sandton City, Monder, Northcliff, Durban and Cape Town. Their retail properties comprise 6 super regional shopping centres and one community centre. EPPF

[8]EPPF is a benefit fund with defined employer and employee contributions, providing retirement, withdrawal, death, and disability benefits to members, pensioners and dependants. The primary target firm

[9]Mimosa Mall is a regional shopping centre with grade P office space situated in Bloemfontein. 3 Competition analysis

[10]There is no geographic overlap in the activities of the merging firms, as the acquiring firm does not have properties in Bloemfontein where the Mimosa Mall, the target property, is situated. The proposed transaction is therefore unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Public Interest

[11]There are no public interest issues. Conclusion

[12]The merger is approved unconditionally. ________________ 3 December 2008 D Lewis DATE Tribunal Member N Manoim and Y Carrim concurring. Tribunal Researcher : R Kariga For the merging parties: Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Attorneys For the Commission : M Matsimela (Mergers and Acquisitions)

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.