Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 16 February 2011

Fountainhead Breeze

CT LM078Nov10 · case LM078Nov10

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 16 February 2011
CitationCT LM078Nov10
Case numberLM078Nov10

The judgment

The court's own file

1 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 76/LM/Nov10 In the matter between: Fountainhead Property Trust Acquiring Firm And All Top Properties (Pty) Ltd & Breeze Court Investments 33 (Pty) Ltd In respect of property letting enterprise known as Lefika Target Firm Panel : Norman Manoim (Presiding Member), Yasmin Carrim (Tribunal Member) and Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member) Heard on : 16/02/2011 Order issued on : 16/02/2011 Reasons issued on : 22/02/2011 Reasons for Decision Approval

[1]On 16 February 2011 the Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between Fountainhead Property Trust (“Fountainhead”) and All Top Properties (Pty) Ltd (“All Top”) and Breeze Court Investments 33 (Pty) Ltd (“Breeze Court”). The reasons follow below. The Transaction

[2]In terms of the proposed transaction, Fountainhead which is a publicly listed property trust managed by Fountainhead Property Management Limited and 2 which is jointly controlled by Standard Bank Properties and Liberty Group, is acquiring the property letting enterprise known as Lefika House which is co-owned by All Top (60%) and Breeze Court (40%).

[3]All Top and Breeze Court are both property owning companies which invest in and develop immovable properties for the purpose of earning rental income. They co- own the Lefika House property which is an A-grade office space located in Brooklyn/Nieuw Muckleneuk, Pretoria. Lefika House is currently occupied by the Auditor General in terms of a lease agreement which expires in 2019.

[4]Post merger, Fountainhead will have sole control over Lefika House. The Rationale

[5]For Fountainhead the proposed transaction is in line with its growth strategy and both All Top and Breeze Court agreed to take the offer from Fountainhead in order to realise their investment in respect to the Lefika property. Competition Analysis Horizontal and Vertical Analysis

[6]There is no horizontal overlap or vertical relationship between the parties as Fountainhead currently does not have A-grade office space in Brooklyn/Nieuw Muckleneuk where the target property is based. CONCLUSION

[7]Consequently the proposed transaction is unlikely to lead to a substantial prevention or lessening of competition .There are no public interest concerns. Accordingly the proposed transaction is approved unconditionally. ____________________ 22/02/2011 N Manoim Date 3 Y Carrim and M Mokuena concurring Tribunal Researcher: Londiwe Senona For the merging parties: Vani Chetty Competition law For the Commission: Lerato Monareng

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.