Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 30 October 2013

Skynet Crossroads

CT LM144Oct13 · case LM144Oct13

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 30 October 2013
CitationCT LM144Oct13
Case numberLM144Oct13
CoramTakalani Madima, Andiswa Ndoni, Medi Mokuena

The judgment

The court's own file

eompetitiontribunal ‘Fauwth afe len COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No.; 017996 In the matter between SkyNet South Africa (Proprietary) Limited Primary Acquiring Firm And The Warehouse and SkyNet Worldwide Express Primary Target Firm Division operated by Crossroads Distribution (Proprietary) Limited Panel : Takalani Madima (Presiding Member) Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member) Medi-Mokuena (Tribunal Member) Heard on : 30 October 2013 Order issued on : 30 October 2013 Reasons issued on : 20 November 2013 Reasons for Decision Approval

[1]On 30 October 2013 the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the merger between SkyNet South Africa (Proprietary) Limited (“SkyNet JV’) and The Warehouse and SkyNet Worldwide Express Division (“SkyNet SA”) operated by Crossroads Distribution (Proprietary) Limited (“CRD”).

[2]The reasons for approving the proposed transaction foliow. Parties to transaction

[3]The primary acquiring firm is SkyNet JV which is a special purpose vehicle which has been recently incorporated specifically to facilitate entry of SkyNet Africa Investments B.V (“SkyNet Investments”) into South Africa. SkyNet Investments is in turn controlled as to 80% by SkyNet Europe BV (‘SkyNet Europe’), a firm incorporated in terms of the laws of the Netherlands and provides courier, express and parcel services (“CEP services”) in the Netherlands. SkyNet JV does not currently conduct any business activities.

[4]The primary target firm is SkyNet SA, a firm incorporated in terms of the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. CRD is jointly controlled by Crossroads Distribution Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“CDH”) and By Nedcor Investments Limited (‘NIL’). SkyNet SA Division is a member of the global “SkyNet Worldwide Express Network (“SkyNet Network”). Independently owned and operated locally in various jurisdictions around the world, the SkyNet Network is a unique international courier cooperative comprised of courier companies operating as SkyNet licenses. In South Africa SkyNet. SA provides CEP services by collecting and delivering of various weights/volumes, by air or road to more than 450 locations across South Africa on a daily basis.' Proposed transaction

[5]In terms of the proposed transaction, SkyNet JV will purchase SkyNet SA operated by CRD as a going concern. Thus post merger SkyNet JV will have sole control of SkyNet SA Competition assessment

[6]The proposed transaction raises no overlaps as the target firm does not conduct any business activities.

[7]In addition no geographic overlap arises since SkyNet Investments is active in Netherlands and SkyNet SA Division is active in South Africa. ‘ See page 57 of the Merger record. Public interest

[8]An assessment on the impact of employment by the proposed transaction. revealed that six employees from the target firm will be negatively affected. However these employees are six out of 760 employees, and they are highly skilled employees. who. can easily find employment. In addition when the Commission spoke to these employees, five out of the six submitted that they had already obtained alternative employment and they were happy with their retrenchment packages.” We are thus satisfied that the proposed transaction will not have negative impact on employment or any other public interest issue.

[9]Therefore, we conclude that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. CONCLUSION

[10]We approve the merger unconditionally. 20 November 2013 Takalani Madima DATE Andiswa Ndoni and Medi Mokuena concurring Tribunal Researcher: — Caroline Sserufusa For the merging parties: HB Senekal of Edward Nathans Sonnenbergs Inc For the Commission: Gilberto Biacuana ? See Transcript of hearing at page 2.

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.