CT LM007Apr14 · case LM007Apr14
In the matter between: COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 018762. SA RETAIL PROPERTIES (PTY) LTD Primary Acquiring Firm And AFHCO HOLDINGS Primary Target Firm Panel Heard’ on Order Issued on Reasons Issued on : MrA Roskam (Presiding Member) : Prof. | Valodia (Tribunal Member) : Prof. F Tregenna (Tribunal Member) : 18 June 2014 : 18 June 2014 : 16 July 2014 Reasons for Decision Approval
[1]On 18 June approved the entire issued 2014, The Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally . acquisition by SA Retail (Pty) Ltd (“SA Retail’) to acquire the : share capital in AFHCO Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“AFHCO”). Post- merger SA. Corporate Real Estate Fund (‘SA Corp”) will have sole indirect control over AFHCO.
[2]The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow. g Parties to the transaction.
[3]The primary acquiring firm is SA Retail,’a wholly owned subsidiary of SA Corporate Real Estate Fund Nominee (“SACN"). SACN is controlled by SA Corp, a company listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange. SA Corp’s shareholders with an interest of more than 5% include; Government Employment. Pension Fund, Coronation Fund Managers and Stanlib Asset Management. SACN holds: 100% shares in Blue Heron (Pty) Ltd, Dune Lark Investments, Erf 84-85-86 Shakes Head. (Pty) Ltd, Wood Ibis Investments (Pty) Ltd, Grey Heron Investments (Pty) Ltd, Whirlprops 25 (Pty) Ltd, Rock Kestel Investments (Pty) Ltd and Stonedell Investments (Pty) Lid. SACN holds 75% shares in Umlazi Mega City (Pty) Ltd.
[4]The primary target firms is AFHCO, its shareholders include; IDEA Managed Fund, Mr Wayne Plit and Ms Renney Plit, AFHCO holds 100% interest in various. companies including AFHCO (Pty) Ltd (‘AFHCO Sub’), AFHCO Property (Pty) Ltd, Urban Housing Finance (Pty) Lid and Protea Glen Housing (Pty) Ltd. AFHCO Sub coritrols more than 11 companies, Proposed Transaction
[5]SA Corp through its. subsidiary SA Retail intends to acquire the entire issued share capital in AFHCO. Post-merger SA Corp will have sole indirect control over AFHCO. Rationale {6] The proposed transaction offers SA Corp the opportunity to acquire an established and experienced management team in the residential sector, For 2 AFHCO shareholders the sale provides an opportunity to realise their investment at an appropriate time in their careers, Relevant Market and Impact on Competition
[7]
[8]
[10](11] SA Retail group isa collective investment scheme which invests in property (also known’ as a property unit trust}. It has a total of 134 properties that comprises of 26 retail properties, 89 industrial properties. and 19 office properties and they are ail located in the Gauteng Province. Relevant for this transaction are the 124 properties. AFHCO is a property investment company that has a total of 62 properties. comprising of 27 residential properties, 31 retail properties, 1 light industrial property and 4. office properties mostly located within. the Johannesburg Central Business. District (“CBD”) and Newtown. The proposed transaction does result in horizontal overlap arising in relation to. provision of B-Grade and C-Grade office space, the market for provision of rentable retail space in convenience centres and the market for provision of rentable space in light industrial property. In the market for Grade B and C office properties 7 properties were identified as overlapping post the transaction. However, the Competition Commission found that there is no geographic overlap in the areas of rentable. office space in B-Grade and C-Grade and the market for the provision of réntable space in light industrial propetty. The B-Grade and C-Grade properties are not within the same node as AFCHO, the B-Grade is within a 26km distance and the C- Grade office properties are within a 5km distance. The Commission also considered the market for provision of rentable space in retail property within the 6km distance of the Johannesburg CBD node. In this node SA Gorp has a total GLA of 5506m? and a market share of 2.2% and AFHCO has a total GLA of 40926 and a marketshare of 14.4%. SA Corp will have a post ~merger market share of 16.6%. The Commission found that the 3 parties post-merger estimated market shares were not significant to raise competition concerns and competitors in the market still have a market share of 83.4% and a GLA of 246 213m?. Competitors include; Bel Air shopping centre (7.3%), Centra Continental (6.0%), Thrupps Centre (6.4%) and Bramley shopping centre. {t2] In the market of provision of rentable space in light industrial property, the Commission found that notie of the SA Corp properties: are located within the South-West Industrial node. where AFHCO’s one property is located therefore there is no geographic overlap. Conclusion {12] In light. of the above we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to Loh substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for provision of rentable of B-Grade. and C-Grade office space, the market for provision of rentable retail space in convenience centre and: the market for provision of rentable space in light industrial property. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly we approve the: proposed transaction unconditionally. Lo enn 16 July 2014 ao Prof. F Tregenna DATE Prof. | Valodia and Mr A Roskam concurring Tribunal Researcher: Moleboheng Moleko For the merging parties: Desmond Rudman — Webber Wenitzel For the Commission: Hardin Ratshisusu, Xolela Nokele, Seema Nunkoo and Dineo Mashego.
Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.