Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 22 April 2015

TLT Actom and Actom Mechanical

CT LM198Feb15 · case LM198Feb15

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 22 April 2015
CitationCT LM198Feb15
Case numberLM198Feb15
CoramNorman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Anton Roskam

The judgment

The court's own file

NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 020693 In the matter between: TLT ACTOM (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm And ACTOM Mechanical Equipment, the mines, industrial Primary Target Firm and heating, ventilation and air conditioning business of ACTOM (Pty) Ltd Panel Norman Manoim (Presiding Member) Yasmin Carrim (Tribunal Member) Anton Roskam (Tribunal Member) Heard on : 22 April 2015 Order issued on : 22 April 2015 Reasons issued on : 21 May 2015 Reasons for Decision Approval i1] 12] On 22 April 2015 the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved a large merger between TLT ACTOM (Pty) Ltd (“TLT ACTOM”) and ACTOM Mechanical Equipment (“ACTOM MEQ”), the mines, industrial and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning business of ACTOM (Pty) Ltd. The reasons for approving the transaction follow. Parties to the transaction

[3]The primary acquiring firm is TLT ACTOM, a newly incorporated South African joint venture company. TLT ACTOM has two shareholders, namely, ACTOM (Pty) Ltd ““ACTOM’) and TLT Turbo GmbH (“TLT Turbo”). ACTOM is solely controlled by ACTOM SA (Pty) Ltd “(“ACTOM

[4]

[6]

[7]NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION SA’) which is in turn solely controlled by ACTOM Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (““ACTOM Holdings”). ACTOM Holdings is not controlled by any single shareholder. ACTOM controls Magnet Employee Benefit Consultants (Pty) Ltd (“Magnet”) and ACTOM Africa (Pty) Ltd (ACTOM Africa’). ACTOM SA indirectly controls Motiv Electronical South Africa (Pty) Ltd (“Motiv”). TLT ACTOM does not control any firm. TLT Turbo is a German-based multinational. It is solely controlled by the Power Construction Corporation of China (“PCCC”). PCCC is wholly owned by the Chinese Government. TLT ACTOM does not currently conduct any business. ACTOM is a manufacturer, solution provider, repairer and distributor of electro- mechanical equipment in Africa. ACTOM is also a major supplier of electrical equipment and services for renewal energy projects. TLT Turbo is a global manufacturer of technology-driven industrial fans and ventilation systems. It develops and builds radial and axial flow fans, wind tunnels and tunnel ventilation systems. The primary target firm is ACTOM MEQ, the mines, industrial and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning business of ACTOM. ACTOM MEQ does not control any firm. ACTOM is solely controlled by ACTOM SA. ACTOM MEQ is the sub-unit of ACTOM and is active in the manufacture and supply of axial flow and centrifugal fans for the mining and industrial sectors in South Africa. Proposed transaction and rationale 18] In terms of the structure of the proposed transaction, TLT ACTOM intends to acquire the business of ACTOM MEQ as a going concern. Pre-merger, ACTOM held 100% of the shares in ACTOM MEQ. Post- merger, ACTOM will hold [...] of the shares in ACTOM MEQ and the remaining [...] will be held by TLT Turbo. Following implementation, ACTOM MEQ will constitute a wholly-owned, stand-alone business unit

[9]

[10]NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION of TLT ACTOM and the business unit will be conducted using TLT Turbo technology. The rationale for TLT Turbo is that the proposed transaction presents it with an opportunity to enter the South African market and establish a base for expansion into Africa. ACTOM MEQ submitted that its long standing technology partner, namely, Flakt Woods, has terminated its technology licensing agreement with ACTOM. According to ACTOM MEQ, it needs _ international technology in order to continue to supply mining and industrial fans in South Africa. ACTOM MEQ has therefore identified TLT Turbo as the best “quick fit” alternative international technology provider for it. Competition assessment

[11]{12] The Commission identified horizontal overlaps in the activities of the merging parties in respect of two markets, namely (i) the manufacture and supply of industrial and process fans and (ii) aftermarket ancillary services for industrial and process fans (i.e. replacement of spare paris, maintenance and repairs). The Commission defined the relevant geographic market for both product markets as being national. In relation to market shares, the Commission found that the merging parties’ post-merger market shares will be as follows: (i) the manufacture and supply of industrial and process fans — less than 20% and (ii) aftermarket ancillary services for industrial and process fans — less than 10%. Competitors of the merging parties in both markets include Trojan fans, RME Engineering CC, Airblow Fans, CFW Industrial and Howden and Donken. The Commission also found that the proposed transaction also result in a vertical relationship between the activities of the merging parties as post-merger TLT Turbo will become ACTOM MEQ’s new supplier of the

[13]

[14]NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION technology used for the design and manufacture of mining and industrial process fans. The Commission however found that input foreclosure is unlikely to occur as pre-merger TLT Turbo does not supply any of TLT ACTOM’s competitors with the fan technology. Similarly, the Commission found that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in customer foreclosure as no other technology providers currently supply ACTOM MEQ with alternative fan technology. The Commission further considered whether the transaction will facilitate coordination in the mining and industrial fans markets. According to the Commission’s findings, coordination is unlikely to be sustained as inter alia the products involved are in non-homogenous markets characterized by innovation and pricing for the products is not transparent, meaning that deviations are unlikely to be detected. Based on the above, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the affected markets. Public Interest

[15]The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will have no effect on employment. ' CONCLUSION

[16]We agree with the Commission’s findings that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the identified markets. We therefore approve the transaction without conditions. The proposed transaction raised no public interest concerns. ' See page 8 of the merger record. f Mr Nor ian Manoim 21 May 2015 DATE Ms Yasmin Carrim and Mr. Antom Roskam concurring. Tribunal Researcher: For the merging parties: For the Commission: ipeleng Selaledi Heather Irvine of Norton Rose Fulbright Daniela Bove

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.