Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 9 November 2016

Wendel SE And Tsebo Holdings (Pty) Ltd

CT LM131Oct16 · case LM131Oct16

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 9 November 2016
CitationCT LM131Oct16
Case numberLM131Oct16
CoramAndreas Wessels, Andiswa Ndoni, Mondo Blessing Mazwai

The judgment

The court's own file

ec competitioatribynat cometh apr ted COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: LM1310ct16 In the matter between: WENDEL SE Primary Acquiring Firm and TSEBO HOLDINGS PROPRIETARY LIMITED Primary Target Firm Panel - AW Wessels (Presiding Member) - Mondo Mazwai (Tribunal Member) - Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)’ Heard on : 09 November 2016 Order Issued on : 09 November 2016 Reasons Issued on : 05 December 2016 Reasons for Decision Approval (1] On 09 November 2016, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) approved the proposed transaction involving Wendel SE and Tsebo Holdings Proprietary Limited.

[2]The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow. Parties to proposed transaction Primary acquiring firm

[3]The primary acquiring firm is Wendel SE (“Wendel”), a French investment company listed on the Euronext Paris. Wendel has one core shareholder being Wendel Participations SE (“Wendel Participations”) with the rest of Wendel’s shareholding widespread. Wendel controls a large number of firms globally. In relation to South Africa, Wendel controls a number of companies with operations or sales in South Africa, including Stahl (incorporated in the Netherlands), Constantia Flexibles (incorporated in Austria), Bureau Veritas (incorporated in France) and CSP Technologies (incorporated in the USA). Stahl is active in the market for process chemicals for leather products and performance coatings for flexible substrates such as textile, paper, plastics and polymers. Constantia Flexibles produces flexible packaging solutions and labels primarily for the food and pharmaceuticals industries. Bureau Veritas provides compliance and certification and laboratory testing services. CSP Technologies designs and manufactures patented packaging solutions for moisture and/or oxygen-sensitive products. Primary target firm 5] The primary target firm is Tsebo Holdings Proprietary Limited (“Tsebo”), a private company duly incorporated according to the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. Tsebo’s South African operations are housed in Tsebo Solutions Group (Pty) Ltd. Tsebo is primarily involved in the business of providing facilities management solutions, catering, cleaning and security. It is also involved in the business of providing hygiene supplies and energy management solutions. Proposed transaction

[7]Wendel intends to, through a South African shelf company, acquire sole control over the business of Tsebo. Post-merger, Tsebo will be wholly owned by Wendel. Impact on competition

[8]The Competition Commission (“Commission”) considered the merging parties’ activities and found that there is no horizontal or vertical overlap in their activities. The Commission therefore concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. We concur with the Commission’s conclusion. Public interest

[9]The merging parties in their merger filing confirmed that the proposed transaction will not result in any adverse impact on employment.’

[10]However, during the Commission’s investigation it received a Notice of Intention to Participate from the National Union of Mineworkers (“NUM”). NUM represents some of the employees of Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories (Pty) Ltd (“BVI”). NUM claimed that the proposed transaction was going to result in job losses.

[11]The Commission upon further investigation however found that certain retrenchments taking place at BVI were not related to the proposed merger but were rather linked to BVI losing a key contract pre-merger. We note that the Commission further engaged with NUM on this issue and that NUM ultimately elected to withdraw its Notice of Intention to Participate. {12] | The proposed transaction further raises no other public interest concerns. Conclusion

[13]In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no other public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally. ” 05 December 2016 Mr AW Wessels DATE Ms Mondo Mazwai and Ms Andiswa Ndoni Tribunal Case Manager: Karissa Moothoo Padayachie For the merging parties: Derek Lotter of Bowman Gilfillan Inc For the Commission: Ratshidaho Maphwanya ‘ Merger Record inter alia pages 10 and 57.

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.