Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 10 February 2016

Bongicel and Lusitania Food Products

CT LM224Jan16 · case LM224Jan16

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 10 February 2016
CitationCT LM224Jan16
Case numberLM224Jan16
CoramYasmin Carrim, Medi Mokuena, Fiona Tregenna

The judgment

The court's own file

e campetitiontribunal banih africa COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Bongicel (Pty) Ltd and Lusitania Pty Ltd Case No: LM224Jan16 Acquiring Firm Target Firm Panel Heard on Order issued on : Reasons issued on : Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member) Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member) Fiona Tregenna_ (Tribunai-Member) 10 February 2016 10 February 2016 23 March 2016 Reasons for Decision Approval 1. On 10 February 2016 the Competition Tribunal (the “Tribunal’) unconditionally approved an acquisition by Bongicel (Pty) Lid (“Bongicel”), of Lusitania (Pty) Ltd (“Lusitania”). 2. The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow. The Parties and their activities . The primary acquiring firm is Bongicel, a newly incorporated special purpose vehicle company, established for the purpose of the proposed transaction. Bongicel is controlled by Moumo Integrated Development (Pty) Ltd (“Moumo’), which is in turn ultimately controlled by the Royal Bafokeng Nation Deveiopment Trust (“the Royal Bafokeng Trust”), a trust registered in accordance with the laws of South Africa. The Royal Bafokeng Trust has in excess of 46 subsidiaries. Bongicel does not control any firm. . Bongicel is incorporated for the purposes of the proposed transaction and does not have any activities. The Royal Bafokeng Trust is an investment holding trust and its subsidiaries are involved in services for the mining, oil and gas, resources, construction, property, telecommunications, transport, aviation, energy, shipping and courier and financial services sectors. . The primary target firm is Lusitania, a company registered-in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Lusitania is wholly-owned by the Pocot Trust (“Pocot Frust”). Lusitania and the Pocot Trust form part of the Kempston Group of Companies (“Kempston Group”). The Kempston Trust has in excess of 40 subsidiaries. . Lusitania is involved in the wholesale distribution of frozen and/or chilled prepared branded meat products, seafood, vegetables, dairy goods, desseris, pastries and cakes to the hospitality industry. including hotels, restaurants and caterers. Proposed transaction and rationale . In terms of the proposed transaction, Bongicel intends to acquire as a going concern, the entire business of Lusitania comprising of the entire fixed assets, stock, goodwill, trade names, trademarks and _ operations, specifically excluding the book debts and employee liabilities. On completion; Bongicel wil have sote control over Lusitania: 8. According to the Royal Bafokeng Trust the proposed transaction will inter alia create employment and _ skiils development opportunities for the Bafokeng people in the agricultural sector. 9. The Kempston Group submitted that it wants to sell Lusitania so that it can return its focus to its core areas of expertise, i.e. transport, logistics and rentals. Competition Analysis 10. The Commission found that there is no overlap between the activities of the merging parties as the Royal Bafokeng Trust does not currently own investments or interests in firms involved in the distribution of frozen and/or chilled food related products in competition with Lusitania. 11.The Commission therefore concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Public interest 12. The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will have no adverse effect on employment and will not result in any retrenchments in South Africa. The proposed transaction raises no other public interest concerns. Conclusion 13.In light of the above, we agree with the Commission that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Further, we agree with the Commission that proposed transaction is unlikely to result in significant public interest concerns. We therefore approve the proposed transaction unconditionally. 23 March 2016 Ms Yasmin Carrim Date Ms Medi Mokuena and Professor Fiona Tregenna concurring Tribunal Researcher : Ipeleng Selaledi For the merging parties : Mark Thomas of Tabacks Attorneys For the Commission : Maanda Lambani

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.