Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 22 March 2017

Redefine Properties And Cirano Investments 300

CT LM213Feb17 · case LM213Feb17

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 22 March 2017
CitationCT LM213Feb17
Case numberLM213Feb17
CoramEnver Daniels, Andiswa Ndoni, Fiona Tregenna

The judgment

The court's own file

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: LM213Feb17 In the matter between: REDEFINE PROPERTIES LIMITED Acquiring Firm and CIRANO INVESTMENTS 300 (PTY) LTD Target Firm in respect of a 17.31 percent undivided share in the property letting enterprise known as the Galleria Panel : Andiswa Ndoni (Presiding Member) ‘iona Tregenna (Tribunal Member) : Enver Daniels (Tribunal Member Heard on 22 March 2017 Order Issued on : 22 March 2017 Reasons Issued on 112 April 2017 Reasons for Decision Approval

[1]On 22 March 2017, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) approved the proposed transaction between Redefine Properties Limited ("Redefine") and Cirano Investments 300 (Pty) Ltd (“Cirano”) in respect of a 17.31% undivided share in the property letting enterprise known as the Galleria (“Target Property’).

[2]The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow. Parties to the Proposed Transaction Primary Acquiring Firm 13]The primary acquiring firm is Redefine, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. It is listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange and is not controlled by any firm. Redefine controls a number of firms, including Pivotal Fund Limited (“Pivotal”). Primary Target Firm (4)The business being acquired is a 17.31% undivided co-ownership share in a property called the Galleria (‘the Target Property’). The Target Property is currently owned through a joint venture by Redefine (45%), Pivotal (20%), Cirano (25%) and Abshelf 04 (Pty) Ltd (10%). Proposed Transaction and Rationale (5) (6) Redefine will increase its shareholding in the joint venture by acquiring an additional 17.31% interest from Cirano, thereby increasing it's shareholding to 62.31%." Post-transaction Redefine will control the Target Property.? The Target Property represents a prime redevelopment site and the proposed transaction will allow Redefine to align with its investment strategy J (REE. 0m Cirano's perspective, the planned redevelopment of the Target Property [iii EE (oes 101 ft within Cirano’s investment strategy. Relevant Market and Impact on Competition " Pivotal intends acquiring the remaining 7.69% interest from Cirano, increasing it’s shareholding to 27.69%. ? Post-transaction Redefine will essentially hold a 90% shareholding, directly through Redefine (62.31%) and indirectly through Pivotal (27.69%), in the Target Property. 7 (8) (9)

[10](11)

[12]Redefine is a property investment company, which holds a diverse range of properties throughout South Africa. Relevant to the proposed transaction are the Acquiring Group's office, retail and residential properties located in Rosebank and surrounding areas. The Target Property is situated in Rosebank, Gauteng Province, and currently comprises of 15 400m? Grade B Office space and 1 017m? retail space. The Target Property, however, is in the process of being redeveloped and once development is complete the Target Property will comprise 52 000m? of Grade P office space, 3 000m? of retail space and 25 000m? of residential space. As such the Commission found a horizontal overlap in the provision of rentable space in office property, the provision of rentable space in retail property, and the provision of rentable space in residential property. It analysed these as three separate markets. With regards to the market for the provision of rentable office property the Commission found a geographic overlap only in the provision of rentable Grade B office space but considered that Grade A and P office property within the Rosebank and adjacent nodes could constrain each other.> In the market for the provision of rentable office property the Commission found that, post-transaction, the merged entity will account for 23.34% of the Grade B office property market and 16.7% of the Grade P and A office property market. In the market for the provision of rentable retail property the merged entity will have a market share of 6.6% post-transaction. Furthermore, the merged entity will continue to face competition from other players, including Growthpoint and Liberty as well as other new developments and convenience centres. In terms of the market for the provision of rentable residential property, the rentable residential spaces in the final developed property will be sold to the 2 This is in accordance with the approach adopted by the Tribunal in Investec Property (Pty) Ltd and ‘Spareprops (Pty) Ltd in respect of Erf 247 Rosebank Township (019307). general public and not kept by Redefine. As such the Commission did not assess the competitive effects in this market any further.

[13]The Commission is therefore of the view that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the relevant markets. We concur with this finding. Public Interest

[14]The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will not result in any adverse effect on employment as Cirano does not currently employ any employees in respect of the Target Property.*

[15]The Commission was of the view that the proposed transaction is unlikely to raise concerns on any other public interest grounds. Conclusion

[16]In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to ‘substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market or raise any adverse public interest issues. Accordingly, we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally. il 2017 Ms Andiswa Ndo! DATE Prof Fiona Tregenna and Mr Enver Daniels concurring Tribunal Researcher: Hayley Lyle For the merging parties: Vani Chetty of Baker & McKenzie For the Commission: Zintle Siyo Page 47 of the Merger Record.

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.