CT LM069Jul19 · case LM069Jul19
competitiontribunal SOUTH AFRICA COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No.: LM069Jul19 In the matter between: Hulamin Systems (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm And The Aluminium Rolling Slab Business of Isizinda Primary Target Firm Alumnium (Pty) Ltd Panel : M Mazwai (Presiding Member) E Daniels (Tribunal Panel Member) Y Carrim (Tribunal Panel Member) Heard on : 04 September 2019 Decided on : 04 September 2019 ORDER Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 (‘the Act”) the Competition Tribunal orders that— 1. the merger between the abovementioned parties approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and 2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a). t AWiLeawe 04 September 2019 Presiding Merffber Date Mondo Mazwai Concurring: Mr Enver Daniels and Ms Yasmin Carrim = eas competitiontribunal SOUTH AFRICA Merger Clearance Certificate Date : 04 September 2019 To : Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs Attorneys Case Number: LMO69Jul19 Hulamin Systems (Pty) Ltd And The Aluminium Rolling Slab Business of Isizinda Alumnium (Pty) Ltd You applied to the Competition Commission on _26 June 2019 for merger approval in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Competition Act. Your merger was referred to the Competition Tribunal in terms of section 14A of the Act, or was the subject of a Request for consideration by the Tribunal in terms of section 16(1) of the Act. After reviewing all relevant information, and the recommendation or decision of the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal approves the merger in terms of section 16(2) of the Act, for the reasons set out in the Reasons for Decision. This approval is subject to: no conditions. L | the conditions listed on the attached sheet. The Competition Tribunal has the authority in terms of section 16(3) of the Competition Act to revoke this approval if a) it was granted on the basis of incorrect information for which a party to the merger was responsible. b) the approval was obtained by deceit. c) a firm concerned has breached an obligation attached to this approval. The Registrar, Competition Tribunal This form is prescribed by the Minister of Trade and Industry in terms of section 27 (2) of the Competition Act 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998).
Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.