CT LM170Dec20 · case LM170Dec20
1 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no: LM170Dec20 In the matter between: And Mercantile Bank, a division of Capitec Bank Ltd Primary Acquiring FirmThe Loan Book owned by Grobank Ltd Primary Target FirmPanel: Y Carrim (Presiding Member): F Tregenna (Tribunal Member) : I Valodia (Tribunal Member)Heard on: 24 February 2021Order Issued on: 24 February 2021Reasons Issued on: 25 February 2021 REASONS FOR DECISION Unconditional approval
[1]On 24 February 2021, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the proposed transaction in terms of which Mercantile Bank (“Mercantile”) intends to acquire the Loan Book owned by Grobank Ltd (the “Loan Book”).
[2]The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow. Parties to the transaction
[3]The acquiring firm is Mercantile, a banking division of Capitec Bank. 1 Mercantile and its controllers will be referred to as the “Acquiring Group”. 1 firm or individual. 2
[4]The Acquiring Group is active in the provision of business and commercial banking services in South Africa (SA). These services and savings plans, forex services to electronic banking, borrowing solutions and retail banking.
[5]2 The Loan Book consists of loans owned by Grobank across three product categories, namely, Commercial property loans; Instalment sales agreements; and Residential home loans. Proposed transaction
[6]Mercantile intends to acquire the Loan Book from Grobank. Post-merger, Mercantile will own the Loan Book. Competition Analysis
[7]The merger parties are both active in the provision of banking services in SA, particularly in narrower segments being the three product categories identified above. However, the merged entity will have minimal market shares in the implicated market segments, with commercial property <2%, instalment sales agreements <1%, and residential home loans <1%. 3
[8]The merged entity will be constrained by larger banks like Nedbank Ltd, First National Bank 4 , ABSA Bank Ltd and Standard Bank Ltd post-merger. Accordingly, the transaction does not give rise to any competition concerns. Public interest
[9]The proposed transaction does not give rise to any public interest concerns. 5 2 including the Government Employees Pension Fund. 3 Merger Record, pages 37-38. 4 A division of First Rand Ltd. 5 Merger Record, page 39. 3 Conclusion
[10]In light of the above, the proposed transaction was approved unconditionally. 25 February 2021Ms Yasmin CarrimDateProf. Imraan Valodia and Prof. Fiona Tregenna concurring. Tribunal Case Manager: Kgothatso Kgobe For the Merging Parties: M Griffiths of Norton Rose Fulbright For the Commission: Y Okharedia and R Darji
Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.