CT LM179Jan21 · case LM179Jan21
1 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no: LM179Jan21 Lereko Capital (Pty) Ltd (Primary Acquiring Firm) and Andru Mining (Pty) Ltd (Primary Target Firm) Heard on: 24 February 2021 Order Issued on: 24 February 2021 REASONS FOR DECISION
[1]On 24 February 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between Lereko Capital (Pty) Ltd (“Lereko Capital”) and Andru Mining (Pty) Ltd (“Andru Mining”).
[2]The transaction involves Lereko Capital acquiring veto rights over certain reserved matters of Andru Mining, such that Lereko Capital will have negative control over Andru Mining.
[3]Lereko Capital is a private equity fund, whose investment portfolio consists of investments in, amongst others, the renewable energy and student accommodation sectors. Lereko Capital is controlled by Lereko Eco (Pty) Ltd and the FirstRand Group. 1
[4]Andru Mining’s activities are focused on contract mining operations in different commodities, such as opencast coal mining and hardrock opencast mining. Andru Mining is currently not controlled by any individual or firm.
[5]There are no horizontal or vertical overlaps between the activities of the merger parties. Despite this, the Commission assessed a notional horizontal overlap in the national market for the provision of open cast mining services, to the extent that Lereko Capital already holds 49% of the shares in Andru Mining. The Commission concluded that there would no change to the structure of the market. Andru Mining has an estimated market share of 8%. Post-merger, there will be no accretion to the market share.
[6]The merger parties will continue to face competition from other players. 2
[7]No third parties raised concerns regarding the effects of the proposed transaction on competition or the public interest. 1 The FirstRand Group has indirect negative control over Lereko Capital through Corvest 12 Pty Ltd (a wholly owned subsidiary of the FirstRand Group). The FirstRand Group is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. 2 Moolmans, Trollope, and Stefanutti Stocks Mining. 2 [8]We concluded that the proposed transaction does not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. [9]In relation to public interest considerations, we note specifically that the proposed transaction will not have a negative effect on the level of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment or worker ownership, which pre-merger is 53.5%, and will remain the same post-merger. 08 March 2021 Mr Enver Daniels Date Ms Mondo Mazwai and Mr Halton Cheadle concurring Tribunal Case Manager:Duduetsang Mogapi For the Merging Parties:J Lurie and K McLean of Bowman Gilfillan For the Commission:M Aphane and T Masithulela
Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.