Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 24 February 2021

IVY 2 Investments VCC And New Holdco

CT LM184Jan21 · case LM184Jan21

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downWednesday 24 February 2021
CitationCT LM184Jan21
Case numberLM184Jan21
CoramEnver Daniels, Halton Cheadle, Mondo Blessing Mazwai

The judgment

The court's own file

1 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no: LM184Jan21 IVY 2 Investments VCC (Primary Acquiring Firm) and New Holdco, a new company formed for the purposes of this transaction (Primary Target Firm) Heard on:24 February 2021Order Issued on:24 February 2021 REASONS FOR DECISION

[1]On 24 February 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between IVY 2 Investments VCC (“IVY” or “the Acquiring Group”) and New Holdco, a newly formed company for the purposes of this transaction (“NewCo” or “the Target Group”).

[2]The transaction involves the Acquiring Group’s acquisition of the convertible preference shares in NewCo, such that the Acquiring Group will have sole control over NewCo post-merger.

[3]IVY is not active in South Africa, however, the Acquiring Group has a global portfolio in financial services; telecommunications, media and technology; transportation and industrials; consumer and real estate; life sciences and agribusiness, as well as energy and resources.

[4]NewCo operates as a holding company and does not conduct any business activities. However, NewCo’s controlling entity, PIL Holdings Pte. Ltd 1 (‘’PIL Holdings”) is engaged in ship-owning and operating activities, shipping agency services and container sales.

[5]There are no horizontal or vertical overlaps in the activities of the merger parties. The Competition Commission, however, noted that PIL SA is currently a respondent in an on-going cartel investigation in the shipping and container market. It concluded that the merger was unlikely to change the existing market structure nor strengthen existing coordination in the shipping and container market, where the alleged collusive conduct is taking place. 1 Incorporated according to the laws of Singapore. 2

[6]The proposed merger raises no public interest concerns.

[7]No third party raised any concern.

[8]We concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on the public interest. 08 March 2021 Mr Enver DanielsDateMs Mondo Mazwai and Mr Halton Cheadle concurringTribunal Case Manager:C MathonsiFor the Merging Parties:P Gounden and S MeyerFor the Commission:G Mutizwa, Z Hadebe and N Msiza

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.