Your first month for R1 Then your plan price. Cancel any time.
Start free
Competition Tribunal · 13 March 2023

Nedbank And Emling Properties

CT LM163Dec22 · case LM163Dec22

CourtCompetition Tribunal
Handed downMonday 13 March 2023
CitationCT LM163Dec22
Case numberLM163Dec22
CoramAndreas Wessels, Andiswa Ndoni, Thando Vilakazi Relevant market The market for retail convenience centres Sector Real estate activities

What it touches

The judgment

The court's own file

1 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no: LM163Dec22 In the large merger between: Nedbank Limited, Acting Through its Nedbank Corporate And Investment Banking Division, Nedbank Property Partners Primary Acquiring FirmAnd Emling Properties Proprietary LimitedPrimary Target Firm Panel:A Wessels (Presiding Member)T Vilakazi (Tribunal Member) A Ndoni (Tribunal Member) Heard on:13 March 2023Order issued on: 13 March 2023Reasons Issued on:30 March 2023 REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction

[1]On 13 March 2023, the Competition Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the merger whereby Nedbank Limited (“Nedbank”) intends to subscribe for 30% of the shares and acquire 30% of the claims in Emling Properties Proprietary Limited (“Emling Properties”) from Capstone Assets Proprietary Limited (“Capstone Assets”) and Mr Hylton David Herring (“Mr Herring”).

[2]Upon the implementation of the proposed transaction, Emling Properties will be jointly controlled by Nedbank, Capstone Assets and Mr Herring. 2 Primary acquiring firm

[3]The principal services offered by Nedbank comprises business, corporate and retail banking, securities trading, investment banking, private banking, foreign exchange, wealth management and property financing.

[4]Relevant to the competition assessment is that Nedbank holds properties through its Nedbank Group Properties Division, Nedbank Property Finance (“NPP”) and more broadly across the group where properties have been acquired through the perfection of security (properties in possession). The activities of Nedbank which are most relevant are those of NPP through which, from time to time (as an aside to Nedbank’s main business focus), it partners with Nedbank’s property clients (which clients invest in property development projects). As such, NPP’s activities sometimes include taking minority stakes in individual property projects. Primary target firm

[5]Emling Properties is a South African property investment firm, currently owned 50% each by Capstone Assets and Mr Herring. Emling Properties has three property subsidiaries. Emling Properties and all of the firms it controls shall collectively be referred to as “Emling Property Group.” Emling Property Group holds retail property in the Gauteng province. Competition assessment

[6]The Competition Commission (“the Commission”) considered the activities of the merging parties and found that they overlap in relation to the provision of rentable retail property in Gauteng.

[7]From a relevant product and geographic market perspective, the Commission assessed the effects of the proposed transaction in a 5 – 10 km radius from the following convenience centres owned by Emling Properties: (i) Shoprite Boksburg; (ii) Voltex Ferndale; (iii) Voltex Pretoria; and (iv) Voltex Villieria. In these respective markets, the Commission found that the merging parties have 3 combined market shares of below 15%, based on the Gross Lettable Areas (“GLAs”) of the properties in the respective areas.

[8]In addition, the retail properties of the merging parties will continue to be constrained by a number of other convenience centres in each of the geographic markets.

[9]We conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to lead to any substantial prevention or lessening of competition in any relevant market due to the low market shares and the existence of other competitors in the relevant markets. Public interest Employment

[10]The merging parties submitted that there will be no negative effect on employment as a result of the proposed transaction. 1 The employee representatives for Nedbank and Emling Properties did not raise any concerns with the proposed transaction.

[11]The Commission found that Emling Properties will continue to be an independent entity and will not be integrated into Nedbank, as such, the proposed transaction is unlikely to lead to duplications and subsequent retrenchments. Spread of ownership

[12]The Nedbank Group has 40.07% black ownership which includes 17.75% black female ownership whereas pre-merger Emling Properties is not owned or controlled by any historically disadvantaged persons. The merging parties submit that post-merger, Nedbank will hold 30% of the shares in Emling Properties and as such the overall Black Economic Empowerment shareholding in Emling Properties will be 12%. 2

[13]The proposed transaction raises no other public interest concerns. 1 See Merger record inter alia pages 8-9. 2 (40.07% x 30%). 4 Conclusion

[14]We conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the proposed transaction does not raise any public interest concerns. 30 March 2023Mr Andreas WesselsDate Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Dr Thando Vilakazi concurring Tribunal Case Managers: Juliana Munyembate and Theodora Michaletos For the Merging Parties: Vani Chetty of Vani Chetty Attorneys For the Commission: Nolubabalo Myoli and Grashum Mutizwa

Read from the court's own list. Judgments are official texts; verify against the court's file before you rely on this page. Firms on AttorneyOS get judgments like this one against the matters they touch, in the Monday edition.